Blog

July 25, 2009 18:09 +0000  |  Activism Copyright Environment Net Neutrality Politics 0

I haven't posted in here for a while, but now that I have a few minutes I've been inspired by Melanie and Karen who are blogging 24hrs today for charity to do a little PSA and share some info about three topics I think everyone should be thinking about.

Copenhagen 2009

In December of this year, 192 countries will gather at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen to essentially determine the future of the planet. It's going to be a mix of climate activists, scientists, politicians and very powerful special interests and there's a lot on the line. Potentially, this conference could mean massive change to help save us from ourselves, both environmentally and economically, or it could be more posturing and inaction. We need to pressure our leaders to Do the Right Thing on this front and let them know that we are willing to support them in doing so.

Hopenhagen

Think of the potential for both the economy and environment. International agreements to raise tariffs on unsustainably harvested primary resources, subsidy programs for R&D into new energy production, or an accord to phase out coal fired plants by 2050. It's possible, the potential is there. Here's some links to get you started:

Copyright Reform

Humanity is changing and at the root of it is how we communicate. What rights we have to control our own culture and what it means to foster creativity and innovation is finally becoming a discussion worth having because for the first time ever, the average person has the potential to become their own printing press.

Technology has given us the tools, but the old guard of copyright owners is actively pushing back to retain their hold on our culture while simultaneously eroding our own privacy rights. Canada has great potential here to stand on its own and do the right thing, thereby becoming a centre for innovation and creativity on the world stage -- we just need the will.

Michael Geist, a copyright lawyer and activist for years on this issue has created a site called Speak Out on Copyright, a compilation of resources covering what you can do to affect change in this area. Talk to your MP, write letters to the editor for your local paper, do whatever you need to help people understand that what the Conservatives want to do right now is more dangerous than the damage Bush did to digital rights in his 8 years as a wrecking ball.

Net Neutrality

The Internet is gradually being eroded into a consumer tool from the powerful equalising force it was from the beginning. The key issue (for me anyway) is that the Internet is moving from a telephone-style system where all traffic moves at the same rate regardless of who's using it or what it's being used for, to a consumer service where people can pay more for better service or access to different content.

This can sound appealing at first until you realise that this means that your ISP (Shaw, Telus, Bell, Rogers, etc) is trying to make it so that you can't use our Internet the way you want. If they don't want to let you see certain sites, they won't, if they don't want you using a particular technology regardless of how you're using it, they'll throttle it or block it altogether. Moves like this impede innovation and turn the power of the Internet over to a conglomerate of 4 companies in Canada... companies we know that from considerable past experience, can't be trusted.

A number of sites have sprung up on this issue:

May 30, 2008 20:25 +0000  |  Democracy NDP Net Neutrality Technology 1

The NDP has tabled a bill to legislate net neutrality:

The four-page bill seeks to amend the Telecommunications Act and "prohibit network operators from engaging in network management practises that favour, degrade or prioritise any content, application or service transmitted over a broadband network based on its source, ownership or destination, subject to certain exceptions."

It also looks to prohibit "network operators from preventing a user from attaching any device to their network and requires network operators to make information about the user's access to the internet available to the user."

The proposed bill makes exception for ISPs to manage traffic in reasonable cases, Angus said, such as providing stable speeds for applications such as gaming or video conferencing.

"There are areas where telecoms have to be able to exercise rights, but that doesn't give them the ability to arbitrarily interfere or discriminate," Angus said.

I know that I've not been a fan of the NDP of late, but they've really done some great work here. This is an important issue that affects the future of democracy and debate in this country and around the world, and the NDP are the only party that has cared enough to do something about it.

Please, read up on net neutrality and then contact your MP to get their support for it. With the combined support of the NDP, the Liberals and the Bloc, the Conservatives will have no choice to let this happen.

And it should happnen.

March 28, 2008 18:43 +0000  |  Net Neutrality Politics Technology 0

A lot of people are still lost as to what Net Neutrality is, let alone why it's important. I posted about it a while back, so I won't reiterate here.

What's new and exciting on the Neutrality front however seems to be the brewings of a perfect storm of sorts. Just as the CBC announced plans to release some of it's programming via bittorrent, Rogers decided to put new bandwidth caps on it's downloads, and Bell started throttling bittorrent traffic to all of it's users as well as all of the companies reselling Bell service without their knowledge or consent.

The result is that the general public is finally starting to wake up to the fact that ISP consolidation and their willingness to abuse their power for their own profit might be a problem. More importantly, we're all starting to feel like there might be a solution. Say it with me boys and girls: Regulation.

I just found out today that the an NDP MP is taking up this issue, and the Council of Canadians has issued a press release on the subject. There's also been considerable media coverage on the mess from mainstream sources like The Globe and Mail. Small beginnings to be sure, but you'll forgive me if I'm just a little hopeful :-)

March 18, 2008 20:12 +0000  |  Net Neutrality Technology 3

I just read this on Michael Geist's blog and had to share:

Sources indicate that the CBC is set to become the first major North American broadcaster to freely release one of its programs without DRM using BitTorrent. Next Sunday, CBC will air Canada Next Great Prime Minister. The following day, it plans to freely release a high-resolution version via peer-to-peer networks without any DRM restrictions. This development is important not only because it shows that Canada's public broadcaster is increasingly willing to experiment with alternative forms of distribution, but also because it may help crystallise the net neutrality issue in Canada.

The CBC's mandate, as provided in the Broadcasting Act, requires it to make its programming "available throughout Canada by the most appropriate and efficient means." Using BitTorrent allows the CBC to meet its statutory mandate, yet with ISPs such as Rogers engaging in non-transparent traffic shaping, millions of Canadians may be unable to fully access programming funded by tax dollars. If the CBC experiment is successful, look for more broadcasters to do the same and for the CRTC to face mounting pressure to address net neutrality concerns.

Ahem, GO CBC!

July 23, 2007 06:13 +0000  |  Net Neutrality 1

This post is no longer relevant since CBC has postponed the story to a later date. I'll probably re-post when I hear about it again.

CBC's "The National" is doing a special on Tuesday night covering all the scary details of what's happening to our rights online and how a few high-profile lawsuits are going to shape the future of the Internet in Canada. If you use Google, Wikipedia, read blogs or publish your own content, this is a very important discussion to have.

Date: Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Time: 10:00pm - 11:00pm
Chanel: CBC

I'm re-posting the event notice I received about this on Facebook here for those interested:

This news story on The National covers political Internet freedoms of speech that you surely hold dear,but that are currently in peril.

A handful of current Canadian lawsuits currently pose an enormous threat to the Internet and politics in Canada, namely:

  • The enormous social and global potential of collaborative computing, social networking, and open source dialogue;
  • Open and frank political speech in Canada, currently being "chilled" as truth disappears;
  • Silencing, real and potential, of Internet whistleblowers, satirists, political humourists, anonymous sources and political dissidents;
  • The potential liability to anyone writing or hosting a blog or a wiki, for fear of legal and financial liability

Political correspondent Leslie Mackinnon interviews Professor of Internet Law Micheal Geist, seasoned blogger Mark Francis, and former Green Party-turned Liberal Party activist Kate Holloway about lawsuits currently opened against them from Wayne Crookes of BC.

Crookes is also currently suing Wikipedia, Google, Yahoo, Myspace, and P2PNet and many more.

PLEASE watch this show to understand the issues better. PLEASE invite all you know on Facebook to this event. PLEASE go to libelchill.ca afterwards to comment and to share your thoughts and read the thoughts of others.

PLEASE take this issue seriously, and finally,

After you see the story, PLEASE go to libelchill.ca and donate to the Defense Fund, a legal fund for the Defendants, to make sure that the Champions of Online Truth can keep fighting for your right to Know, Share and Create online.

February 16, 2007 17:55 +0000  |  Net Neutrality 2

Information Highway
Image found on Popular Science's website.

Colin has been pushing this for a while now and I'm ashamed to say that I haven't given it the attention it deserves. Net Neutrality is one of the most important issues in North America and we're all asleep at the wheel, content to watch our rights disappear because we don't know what we have 'till it's gone.

So lets get "what we have" out in the open.

You're reading this blog because I'm able to publish it and host it for all to see. Regardless of what I might say here, anyone is able to read it regardless of what Internet provider they have. Anyone else can have opposing views on another site somewhere else and their content is just as accessible as mine because the Internet providers, like phone companies, are prohibited from controlling who can see what.

It's infrastructure like this that allows groups like The World Wildlife Fund and The Red Cross to reach out to the general public and propagate information, raise money and affect change. Sites like Livejournal and Google are able to exist because no matter the amount of traffic, the price of disseminating their information remains low as the costs are spread around equally to everyone who uses the Internet. Barack Obama, democratic hopeful for President of the United States, can podcast from his site because the connectivity between he and his supporters remains unbiased, and Linux can be actively developed by programmers around the world because high-speed connections remain cheap enough to download the code they need and get the work done.

This is a good thing, and companies like Telus, Bell, and Rogers want to change it.

They want to change this because frankly, it's more profitable to be able to charge people for "premium" service. The more money you're willing to pay, the more sites you can access. These companies don't care that poor schools can't afford "better" Internet, they only care about money.

Then there's Free Speech. Telus has, in the past restricted access to some sites that criticise their company... because they can. What makes this any different from your electrical company preventing you from using a product they don't want you to use? Standards and level playing fields are good for everyone.

This is a beginning and it's only going to get worse unless someone takes notice. Not one of the major Canadian political parties has taken a position on this issue (not even the Greens or the NDP). Outside of the Environment, the only other "major issue" appears to be bank machine fees... we need our legislators to enshrine net neutrality permanently in Canadian law and we need it done now.

Please write to your MP and ask them to consider the importance of this issue. Write a handwritten letter if you can. For more information, please visit netneutrality.ca or just click on the link I've included at the bottom left side of every page.

Net Neutrality Icon