Blog /Not Invested

August 18, 2008 07:01 +0000  |  Capitalism Money 10

A financial adviser and friend of Noreen's sent me a message a couple weeks ago as a sort of follow up to previous conversations we'd had in the past. Obviously, he was looking to expand his client base and had found my name while flipping through his contact history and so I got a polite email asking if I was interested in investing with him any time soon.

Knowing that having an investment portfolio is supposed to be the smart thing, I gave it a shot. I replied that I had reservations about investing any of my money in funds where my money could be used for "evil", so if I were to do any kind of investment, I'd need fine-grained control over what money went where to ensure a clear conscience.

Like a professional, he responded with a few suggestions based on my tastes, but then he let that professionalism slip when he went on to defend Microsoft as a liberator of the impoverished. He did point out though that even the most ethical of funds he could find leaned heavily on Canada's "Big Five" banks -- institutions which would only re-lend my money to companies like Bruce Power, Shell, and Sony. This, coupled with my less-than-mainstream ideas of "good" and "evil" corporations leaves me with few options.

So I won't be joining the investment train. At least, I won't be going there until I can find a way to square it with my morals. Two things just keep repeating themselves over and over in my head, and until they're satisfied, mutual funds and the like are pretty much off limits:

  1. Capitalism rarely, if ever, does the Right thing
  2. The money we get from investments isn't free. Someone, somewhere is paying for that dividend and it just doesn't feel right to profit from it.

Comments

Lara
18 Aug 2008, 4:25 p.m.  | 

Slightly but not totally related .. remember when I had that call centre job where I had to phone up mutual fund shareholders and ask them to vote on proposals pertaining to their investments?

I still can't get over how many people got absolutely livid with me for calling and bothering them to actually give them some sort of say in what was done with their own invested money. *sigh*

ChadL
19 Aug 2008, 7:36 a.m.  | 

Meanwhile... you keep your cash in a tin can in the back yard? Cause even storing it in that savings|checkings account places it in a place where "evil" accesses it.

My advice: get over it, put your money where it serves *you* best and fight you're good vs evil fight on different terrain.

Daniel
19 Aug 2008, 5:38 p.m.  | 

With all do respect Chad, I disagree. Choosing to do the wrong thing out of either convenience or apathy only to do the Right thing when you have the time is like digging a foundation by night, while dumping soil into the hole by day. Nothing will ever get done and all the bad parts of the world will persist.

If you want to change the world, you first have to stop working against yourself.

You're right about the bank though. I'm currently with CIBC but have been considering a switch to VanCity Credit Union, though I'm unsure as to how "less-evil" they may be. Do you, or anyone have some more info in that column?

ChadL
21 Aug 2008, 7:49 a.m.  | 

I feel my advice was misinterpreted. I probably should have been explicit... I'm not saying to go invest in those products or companies which you disagree with. Instead, just put that money where it's safe and serves you best. For myself, I'm in agreement with you. Capitalism == bad, let's just leave that there and put those loonies in a GIC for now.

I've been tempted by Vancity as well, don't know much on that topic though.

Nice post you linked me to... but is it really entirely up to the consumer to change the world? Does the consumer have the heart to? Does the consumer have the money to? Does the consumer even care? Sure you could wish we lived in a time and a place where all those around us had the same conscience as you and I; but we're humans and we are not all the same. And us humans like our stuff, and with more money we can have more stuff.

Here we go ...

A classic example is the price of gasoline. I suppose you could use the argument to say the rich oil companies are raking in billions (probably more). True enough, no debate there. What's sad is the demonstration and outcry from the general public (us consumers). Each one of us have developed habits and expectations; habits and expectations that are very hard to break. Even at the significant financial cost, many of us will not change our habits but would rather complain about our new problems.

It's habits like those that need to change. Why, when it's the habit of the consumer, should we expect no other than the consumer to change that habit? Consumers generally don't like change. So how do we push that change? Raise prices? Hell no, that would be capitalism wouldn't it? ;)

Shawna Buhler
25 Aug 2008, 9:46 p.m.  | 

i remember reading an article about ethical investing little while back...you should look into it. it does exist
and the author seemed to believe it was possible

Daniel
25 Aug 2008, 10:14 p.m.  | 

Actually, the package I was looking at was what they referred to as an ethical investment plan. One of them, called "London Life Ethics" included Suncor and a series of Canadian banks as acceptable targets -- far from ethical... at least in my book.

I'm going to keep looking, but I have my doubts that I'll ever be able to find an appropriate partner for something like this.

theresa
28 Aug 2008, 1 p.m.  | 

buy canada savings bonds! :)

There is a co-operative bank here that claims to have a strict ethics policy that affects where money is being used and which companies they choose to do business with. i don'[t know what the real practical fallout of this is, but i've never heard another financial insitution make a similar claim.

Daniel
28 Aug 2008, 7:49 p.m.  | 

While I agree with you, I was hoping to be able to help some companies do the Right Thing as well. I dunno, is it crazy to think that I should be able to put 70% of my cash into a Canada Savings Bond and 30% into high-risk, pro-environment stuff? Like a German wind turbine company or a wavepower corporation?

theresa
31 Aug 2008, 6:32 p.m.  | 

maybe the problem is that alot of the really good guys aren't big enough to be publicly traded?

Daniel
31 Aug 2008, 9:09 p.m.  | 

Actually, the problem is even deeper than that. By law, publicly traded companies have to place profit above all else including things like human decency, morality, the environment, the longevity of the species etc. In other words, even if a "good" company were to be big enough to be publicly traded, it wouldn't be "good" for very long.

Post a Comment of Your Own

Markdown will work here, if you're into that sort of thing.